Episode 54 — Present attribution responsibly to decision makers
Presenting attribution findings to executive leadership requires a strategic shift in communication, focusing on the business implications of the threat rather than just the technical name of the actor. This episode teaches you how to brief senior stakeholders on "who" is responsible in a way that manages their expectations and acknowledges the inherent uncertainty of the process. We discuss the importance of highlighting the difference between "digital artifacts" and "human beings," ensuring that leaders do not make oversimplified assumptions about a complex forensic problem. In a GCTI context, you should be prepared to explain how knowing the attacker helps the organization identify their likely "target set" and prioritize future security investments. Troubleshooting involves standing firm on your evidence when pushed for a premature name, maintaining your professional integrity as a neutral source of truth. By presenting attribution responsibly, you act as a strategic guardian, ensuring that the organization makes rational decisions based on verified facts rather than speculation or rumors. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
